homepage

On Mon 28 Apr 2014, Jim Jewett wrote:
> pinging David Watson: What is the status? If I understand correctly, (and I may well not), you have already opened other issues for parts of this, and (only) the final patch is ready for patch (and hopefully) commit review. Is this correct?
No, I haven't opened any separate issues (I would be perfectly
happy with fixing the original renaming-vs-copying problem and
then leaving this issue open to deal with the rest). The patches
mailbox-copy-back-2.7.diff and
mailbox-tests-2.7-part1-for-copy-back.diff are what I suggest
applying for the renaming-vs-copying problem.
I haven't looked at the other patches in much detail, but for
what it's worth, the tests in mailbox-tests-2.7-part2.diff do
pass with mailbox-update-toc-again.diff applied.