Message217242
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
josh.r, jtaylor, neologix, njs, pitrou, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年04月27日.08:30:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAH_1eM346H24rPVVZU8us88tZ7op9Azw_3KsOpZk1zD4q4DK8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1398557150.79.0.531385722906.issue21233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I read again some remarks about alignement, it was suggested to provide allocators providing an address aligned to a requested alignement. This topic was already discussed in #18835.
The alignement issue is really orthogonal to the calloc one, so IMO
this shouldn't be discussed here (and FWIW I don't think we should
expose those: alignement only matters either for concurrency or SIMD
instructions, and I don't think we should try to standardize this kind
of API, it's way to special-purpose (then we'd have to think about
huge pages, etc...). Whereas calloc is a simple and immediately useful
addition, not only for Numpy but also CPython). |
|