Message 216445 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	vstinner
Recipients	Andrew.Boettcher, ajaksu2, akira, astrand, cvrebert, ericpruitt, eryksun, giampaolo.rodola, janzert, josiahcarlson, ooooooooo, parameter, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sbt, techtonik, v+python, vstinner
Date	2014年04月16日.07:28:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1397633307.92.0.404191877838.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I started to review the patch 5: http://bugs.python.org/review/1191964/#ps11598 When I read unit tests, I realized that I don't like "write_nonblocking" name. It's too generic. A process has many files (more than just stdin, stdout, stderr: see pass_fds parameter of Popen). I would like an explicit "write_stdin_nonblocking" and "read_stdout_nonblocking".

Content

I started to review the patch 5:
http://bugs.python.org/review/1191964/#ps11598
When I read unit tests, I realized that I don't like "write_nonblocking" name. It's too generic. A process has many files (more than just stdin, stdout, stderr: see pass_fds parameter of Popen). I would like an explicit "write_stdin_nonblocking" and "read_stdout_nonblocking".

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014年04月16日 07:28:27	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, josiahcarlson, astrand, parameter, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, ooooooooo, v+python, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ericpruitt, akira, Andrew.Boettcher, rosslagerwall, sbt, janzert, eryksun
2014年04月16日 07:28:27	vstinner	set	messageid: <1397633307.92.0.404191877838.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014年04月16日 07:28:27	vstinner	link	issue1191964 messages
2014年04月16日 07:28:27	vstinner	create

homepage