Message216261
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, richard.kiss, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2014年04月15日.01:19:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1397524766.86.0.894076633951.issue21209@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
OK, looks good. I tried your test with my earlier workaround and the wrapper got deallocated too early, proving that my workaround was indeed wrong and your test is useful. I am still concerned theoretically that the CoroWrapper.send() signature is different from a real generator's send() method, but I think that send() to a coroutine is an internal detail anyway, so I can live with that, and I don't see another work-around.
When you commit, can you do upstgream (Tulip) first? |
|