Message215827
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, BreamoreBoy, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, larry, loewis, mark.dickinson, mirabilos, pitrou, schwab, skrah, tim.peters |
| Date |
2014年04月09日.17:23:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1397064206.32.0.949352031405.issue20904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> under some conditions involving denormalized numbers the result may lose a bit of precision
That sounds like a non-issue for this application: the dtoa.c computations are careful to avoid subnormals in intermediate computations.
If mirabilos has withdrawn his objection, is there anything blocking applying this for 3.5? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年04月09日 17:23:26 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, tim.peters, loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, skrah, BreamoreBoy, mirabilos, schwab |
| 2014年04月09日 17:23:26 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1397064206.32.0.949352031405.issue20904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年04月09日 17:23:26 | mark.dickinson | link | issue20904 messages |
| 2014年04月09日 17:23:25 | mark.dickinson | create |
|