Message215103
| Author |
josh.r |
| Recipients |
barry, ethan.furman, josh.r, martin.panter, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2014年03月29日.00:35:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1396053336.55.0.0688263529028.issue20895@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Why would we need bytes.fill(length, value)? Is b'\xVV' * length (or if value is a variable containing int, bytes((value,)) * length) unreasonable? Similarly, bytearray(b'\xVV) * length or bytearray((value,)) * length is both Pythonic and performant. Most sequences support multiplication so simple stuff like this can be done easily and consistently; why invent a new approach unique to bytes/bytearrays? |
|