Message214308
| Author |
vinay.sajip |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, mluis, neologix, ogait87, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, rosslagerwall, slanden, vinay.sajip, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年03月20日.23:37:51 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1395358671.51.0.229983985216.issue10141@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Sorry if I messed up - I just applied the same logic as I thought you had done earlier (replacing #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_CAN_H with #ifdef AF_CAN), and everything compiled OK after my changes.
Are you saying that an additional clause for CAN_RAW being defined should be added around where it is used? Would that sort things out? I'd rather not just revert my change, as that would mean I couldn't compile the SSL module. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年03月20日 23:37:51 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, amaury.forgeotdarc, orsenthil, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, neologix, slanden, rosslagerwall, python-dev, ogait87, mluis |
| 2014年03月20日 23:37:51 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1395358671.51.0.229983985216.issue10141@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年03月20日 23:37:51 | vinay.sajip | link | issue10141 messages |
| 2014年03月20日 23:37:51 | vinay.sajip | create |
|