Message210294
| Author |
vajrasky |
| Recipients |
georg.brandl, larry, richard, serhiy.storchaka, vajrasky |
| Date |
2014年02月05日.09:48:11 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1391593691.28.0.731726492435.issue20517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
"But there are some errors that really need two filenames, like copy(), symlink(), and rename()."
I think *need* is too strong word in this case. I agree that two filenames is better than none. But I don't see anything wrong from omitting filenames in error messages for copy(), etc. If PHP and Perl are taking "omitting filenames" way, surely there is some merit in that way.
I am in if we are taking "two filenames" way just like Ruby does. It's just isn't it too rush for Python 3.4? |
|