Message208796
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
barry, brett.cannon, gennad, gvanrossum, jkloth, larry, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, zach.ware |
| Date |
2014年01月22日.12:57:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1390395464.18.0.24134589934.issue20326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That wasn't quite what I meant. "def (a, b, c)" *looks* like Python syntax (aside from the missing function name), but "def (a, b, c, /)" does not. So I consider "def " a misleading prefix.
By contrast, neither of these looks like it is trying to be a valid function header, while still hinting strongly that it is signature related:
"sig: (a, b, c)"
"sig: (a, b, c, /)"
I would also be fine with "sig=" (since humans shouldn't be reading this regardless):
"sig=(a, b, c)"
"sig=(a, b, c, /)" |
|