Message208556
| Author |
barry |
| Recipients |
Gerrit.Holl, barry, docs@python, georg.brandl |
| Date |
2014年01月20日.17:22:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20140120121548.0927bb96@anarchist.wooz.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1390237853.97.0.751678212058.issue20314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Jan 20, 2014, at 05:10 PM, Gerrit Holl wrote:
>This is potentially confusing. The documentation in this section has not
>made any mention of %-based substitutions. Rather, a novel reader may, at
>this point, think that {}-based substitution is normal. I would suggest to
>resolve this issue by simply not mentioning %-based substitutions, replacing
>the sentence above by:
>
>> Templates support $-based substitutions, using the following rules:
+1
PEP 292 templates predate .format(). |
|