Message208441
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
larry, nikratio, skrah |
| Date |
2014年01月19日.04:14:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1390104869.4.0.224924196002.issue20177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Optional groups really are only for cases when that's the behavior
of the original code. If the original function used a switch statement
examining the size of the tuple, then had different parsing functions based on that size, use optional groups.
But if the function can be expressed with normal positional parameters and default values, that's best. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年01月19日 04:14:29 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, nikratio, skrah |
| 2014年01月19日 04:14:29 | larry | set | messageid: <1390104869.4.0.224924196002.issue20177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年01月19日 04:14:29 | larry | link | issue20177 messages |
| 2014年01月19日 04:14:29 | larry | create |
|