Message206333
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年12月16日.17:16:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4420492.PjgdSlPve1@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to |
<20131216161756.GA12598@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| Content |
> > Did I mention __index__ is an unfortunate name for the current trend for
> > this method?
> Yes, but it's probably too late to change that now. Also, a fully precise
> name would be something like:
>
> __to_int_exact_iff_object_has_integer_nature__ :)
Perhaps in future (may be in 4.0) __index__ should be renamed to __int__ and
__int__ to __trunc__. |
|