Message206326
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年12月16日.16:17:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<20131216161756.GA12598@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1387209659.99.0.89294447009.issue19995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Did I mention __index__ is an unfortunate name for the current trend for this method?
Yes, but it's probably too late to change that now. Also, a fully precise
name would be something like:
__to_int_exact_iff_object_has_integer_nature__ :)
> When you say "accept __index__" do you mean for use as indices, or for use as
> values in the data structure itself?
The latter, see Lib/test/test_buffer.py:2489 . |
|