Message205676
| Author |
Fotis.Koutoulakis |
| Recipients |
Fotis.Koutoulakis, docs@python, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, seydou |
| Date |
2013年12月09日.11:13:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1386587593.23.0.413131823195.issue18576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Ok, here is the second (modified patch) which contains a script so that no modifications are required to existing tests.
I am uploading it as a second patch, so that the first one is left as a reference.
As a sidenote, I fail to see convincing reasons for why we would want the second solution more than the first. The first one looks cleaner to my eyes. The only downside I can see to the original approach is breaking a couple of tests, which is something that can be fixed easily without even making it to the repo (running the tests in 2-3 could help find all possible broken tests beforehand).
Could someone explain to me why the second solution is more desirable? |
|