Message205014
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, benjamin.peterson, dcjim, elachuni, gvanrossum, jon, kristjan.jonsson, mark.dickinson, pitrou, qelan, tseaver, vdupras, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年12月02日.14:30:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1385994621.2301.0.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1385993513.13.0.36769317594.issue7105@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Anyway, it's not for me to decide. We have currently three options:
> a) my first patch, which is a duplication of the 3.x work but is
> non-trivial and could bring stability issues
> b) my second patch, which will increase memory use, but to no more
> than previous versions of python used while iterating
> c) do nothing and have iterations over weak dicts randomly break when
> an underlying cycle is unraveled during iteration.
Either a) or c), for me. We shouldn't change semantics in bugfix
releases. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年12月02日 14:30:24 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, gvanrossum, dcjim, tseaver, mark.dickinson, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, ajaksu2, jon, benjamin.peterson, vdupras, elachuni, BreamoreBoy, qelan |
| 2013年12月02日 14:30:24 | pitrou | link | issue7105 messages |
| 2013年12月02日 14:30:24 | pitrou | create |
|