Message204906
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
arigo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, koobs, neologix, pitrou, sbt, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年12月01日.10:44:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1385894697.2297.7.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAGE7PNKmVJk9oZJ-wr4G5z0pu7ihJxAg-51_DoNM00D6GLHKcQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> Guido's point was that it is already a bug in code to not check the elapsed
> time after a select call returns rather than assuming the full timeout time
> has elapsed.
I don't understand how it's a bug. You're assuming select() has
unreliable timing, but it doesn't (if you are using the same clock). |
|