Message204722
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, alexandre.vassalotti, larry, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年11月29日.15:00:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4090001.itgqsarfWl@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to |
<1385535790.71.0.393337888652.issue19780@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> 22:36:13 [ ~/PythonDev/cpython ]$ ./python.exe -m timeit "import
pickle"
> "with open('test.pickle4', 'rb', buffering=0) as f: pickle.load(f)" 100
> loops, best of 3: 9.28 msec per loop
Did you use the same test file or different files (generated by patched
and unpatched pickler)? Try to run this command several times and take a
minimum.
> I wrote a benchmark to simulate slow reads. But again, there is no
> performance difference with the patch.
Test data are too small, they all less than frame size. |
|