Message 204476 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	neologix
Recipients	neologix, vstinner
Date	2013年11月26日.13:37:34
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAH_1eM2283dBWajB_5atqKtWMWgE4ReS7330Yn2pGw2B5yztmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1385470804.35.0.28766978399.issue19798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> STINNER Victor added the comment: > > @neologix: I would like your opinion first, because you accepted the PEP. Well, I'm not a native speaker, but "peak" does sound better than "max" (I'd say the later refers to an externally-enforced limit, contrarily to the former). So the change looks fine, although: """ `(size: int, peak_size: int)`` """ Would maybe be better with: """ `(current: int, peak: int)`` """ no?

Content

> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>
> @neologix: I would like your opinion first, because you accepted the PEP.
Well, I'm not a native speaker, but "peak" does sound better than
"max" (I'd say the later refers to an externally-enforced limit,
contrarily to the former).
So the change looks fine, although:
"""
`(size: int, peak_size: int)``
"""
Would maybe be better with:
"""
`(current: int, peak: int)``
"""
no?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013年11月26日 13:37:34	neologix	set	recipients: + neologix, vstinner
2013年11月26日 13:37:34	neologix	link	issue19798 messages
2013年11月26日 13:37:34	neologix	create

homepage