Message204163
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan |
| Date |
2013年11月24日.02:27:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADiSq7d32=tEro1BB8OOo9E1D0Kb3xGCTfmk0+6m=77OgWH_2w@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1385222348.06.0.416110381918.issue19713@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
I think we should definitely support them, I just haven't thought of a way
to do that yet which is cleaner than the status quo (it's only the loader
part of the API that isn't fully covered - the rest of the legacy APIs can
be deprecated happily). I may come up with an idea once we start work on
migrating extension module loading in 3.5. |
|