Message203019
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, christian.heimes, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年11月16日.10:24:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1384597479.7.0.380566361319.issue19183@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks - are those numbers with the current feature branch, and hence no small string optimization?
To be completely clear, I'm happy to accept a performance penalty to fix the hash algorithm. I'd just like to know exactly how big a penalty I'm accepting, and whether taking advantage of the small string optimization makes it measurably smaller. |
|