Message202758
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
neologix, sbt, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年11月13日.15:07:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1384355264.37.0.124034387642.issue19565@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> Can't you fix multiprocessing and/or the unit test to ensure that all
>> overlapped operations are completed or cancelled?
> On Vista and later, yes, this is done in the deallocator using
> CancelIoEx(), although there is still a warning.
I don't understand. The warning is emitted because an operating is not done nor cancelled. Why not cancel explicitly active operations in manager.shutdown()? It is not possible?
> ... I think these warnings come from daemon threads used by "manager"
> processes. When the manager process exits some background threads
> may be blocked doing an overlapped read.
I don't know overlapped operations. There are not asynchronous? What do you mean by "blocked doing an overlapped read"? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年11月13日 15:07:44 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, neologix, sbt |
| 2013年11月13日 15:07:44 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1384355264.37.0.124034387642.issue19565@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年11月13日 15:07:44 | vstinner | link | issue19565 messages |
| 2013年11月13日 15:07:44 | vstinner | create |
|