Message200946
| Author |
paul.moore |
| Recipients |
barry, ethan.furman, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pitrou, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2013年10月22日.13:33:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1382448790.86.0.366644312393.issue19331@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
+1 on switching the wording in the overriding principle section to say "factory function to class". Although the fact that I made that mistake reflects my point that if I'm thinking of class->wrapper as an "internal change" then I'm not anticipating or supporting subclassing. (That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it :-))
Nick's revised wording for the class names section took me a couple of reads to follow - it feels a little too complex as a result of trying to cover everything. But I couldn't come up with anything substantially better, so call me +0 on it. |
|