Message200843
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, DLitz, aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, sbt, twouters, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月21日.20:47:56 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAH_1eM0E-+Rn1Aqb6uiUosFZQ5c7=gS1A0v4qPiRXu_8igi8=A@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1382381412.71.0.394561229043.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Well it is customary for callback-based APIs to hold strong references to their callbacks. If a library wants to avoid leaks, it should register a single callback which will then walk the current "live" resources and protect them.
I guess that the custom usage makes sense.
I'd just like a note in the doc, if possible ;-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年10月21日 20:47:56 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, lemburg, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, asvetlov, sbt, aliles, DLitz |
| 2013年10月21日 20:47:56 | neologix | link | issue16500 messages |
| 2013年10月21日 20:47:56 | neologix | create |
|