Message200777
| Author |
DLitz |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, DLitz, aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, sbt, twouters, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月21日.13:42:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1382362966.58.0.793968466399.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The main question is whether a failed prepare callback should prevent the fork from happenning
Yes, I think an exception should prevent the fork from happening.
It's fail-safe for the PRNG case (you can guarantee that a fork won't occur without properly re-seeding a PRNG), and it makes bugs easier to catch in unit testing. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年10月21日 13:42:46 | DLitz | set | recipients:
+ DLitz, lemburg, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, asvetlov, neologix, sbt, aliles |
| 2013年10月21日 13:42:46 | DLitz | set | messageid: <1382362966.58.0.793968466399.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年10月21日 13:42:46 | DLitz | link | issue16500 messages |
| 2013年10月21日 13:42:46 | DLitz | create |
|