Message200177
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Brecht.Van.Lommel, asvetlov, christian.heimes, ideasman42, lemburg, loewis, mont29, ncoghlan, python-dev, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月17日.23:55:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADiSq7cMeA+WoOY2O1cJmDeprR2gso5b50nVYrsE6S5UcesQBw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAMpsgwajxsscWe-3DbUmZNyQMB=tpKvR8dKotp_ywejCwh6Mzg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On 18 Oct 2013 02:41, "STINNER Victor" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>
> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>
> You don't want to mention the return value (-1) on error in the doc?
I guess it should explicitly say any non-zero return value indicates an
error rather than leaving that implied by the fact that zero indicates
success.
Something else occurred to me, though - this runs before Py_Initialize, and
now I'm not sure all the API calls are valid in that context.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16129>
> _______________________________________ |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年10月17日 23:55:24 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, lemburg, loewis, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, asvetlov, ideasman42, skrah, python-dev, Brecht.Van.Lommel, mont29 |
| 2013年10月17日 23:55:24 | ncoghlan | link | issue16129 messages |
| 2013年10月17日 23:55:24 | ncoghlan | create |
|