Message199484
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
barry, christian.heimes, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月11日.14:48:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1710678806.69398357.1381502892237.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<1381502621.16.0.112245222519.issue19219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I meant two of new proposed opcodes: TYPE_ASCII and
> TYPE_ASCII_INTERNED.
You cannot change the meaning of TYPE_UNICODE (it uses "surrogatepass").
Therefore, you have to use new opcodes with other semantics.
Besides, opcodes are cheap. |
|