Message199457
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
barry, christian.heimes, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月11日.09:56:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<691672221.68628960.1381485360180.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<1882276521.68616056.1381485110088.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| Content |
> > Reading the code, I see we now maintain a small internal buffer in
> > the file object, rather than using stack allocation at the call
> > sites. It is unclear to me how this saves memory, since the amount
> > of memory copying should be the same.
>
> No, memory copying is suppressed in many cases.
To clarify: the import logic uses marshal.loads(), not marshal.load().
So the aim is really to speed up unmarshalling from memory. |
|