Message199190
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, kennyluck, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tchrist, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年10月08日.10:28:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1381228087.0.0.494864640397.issue12892@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I repeat myself. Even with the patch, UTF-16 codec is faster than UTF-8 codec (except ASCII-only data). This is fastest Unicode codec in Python (perhaps UTF-32 can be made faster, but this is another issue).
> The real question is: Can the UTF-16/32 codecs be made fast
> while still detecting lone surrogates ? Not whether UTF-16
> is widely used or not.
Yes, they can. But let defer this to other issues. |
|