This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ezio.melotti |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, ezio.melotti, madison.may, mikehoy, ncoghlan, rhettinger, techtonik, terry.reedy, xcombelle |
| Date | 2013年10月05日.23:38:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1381016299.68.0.476857034303.issue19024@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> 223 people + me out of 1422 disagree with you both. Note that those votes doesn't necessarily mean "I didn't know about the feature" -- they might mean "I find this feature useful/I like this feature". Features like decorators have even more votes and I don't think they are "hidden" features. > Current page http://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html#unpacking-argument-lists is > about functionality, not about operators These operators are documented here: http://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#index-36 http://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#index-37 This can be found from the doc index (which admittedly is not the most obvious place where to look): http://docs.python.org/3/genindex-Symbols.html If the problem is the content of the docs, you can suggest what exactly should be improved (and how). If the problem is the discoverability, you should open a separate issue on the Sphinx bug tracker about allowing the search of operators. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013年10月05日 23:38:19 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients: + ezio.melotti, rhettinger, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, techtonik, docs@python, mikehoy, madison.may, xcombelle |
| 2013年10月05日 23:38:19 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1381016299.68.0.476857034303.issue19024@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年10月05日 23:38:19 | ezio.melotti | link | issue19024 messages |
| 2013年10月05日 23:38:18 | ezio.melotti | create | |