Message198598
| Author |
maubp |
| Recipients |
maubp |
| Date |
2013年09月29日.15:27:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1380468434.72.0.0560845262564.issue19111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thinking about this, perhaps the bug is that Python 3 doesn't have a future_builtins module? Consider:
$ python2.6
Python 2.6.8 (unknown, Sep 28 2013, 12:09:28)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux3
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from __future__ import with_statement
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> from future_builtins import map, zip
>>> quit()
versus:
$ python3.3
Python 3.3.2 (default, Sep 28 2013, 12:00:20)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from __future__ import with_statement
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> from future_builtins import map, zip
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ImportError: No module named 'future_builtins'
>>> quit()
The expectation from the __future__ imports is that once a feature is part of Python, the import is a harmless no-op. You could expect the same from future_builtins as well. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年09月29日 15:27:14 | maubp | set | recipients:
+ maubp |
| 2013年09月29日 15:27:14 | maubp | set | messageid: <1380468434.72.0.0560845262564.issue19111@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年09月29日 15:27:14 | maubp | link | issue19111 messages |
| 2013年09月29日 15:27:14 | maubp | create |
|