Message198172
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
kristjan.jonsson, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2013年09月20日.21:11:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1379711490.2501.8.camel@fsol> |
| In-reply-to |
<1379711325.83.0.650786679604.issue19009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Ok, I can make it resilient. I was just pointing out that resilience
> in the face of RFC violations can be a bad thing. E.g. Internet
> explorer and how they allowed internet servers of the world to be lax
> in how they served their data.
I'm afraid the ship has sailed a long time ago on that. Poor HTTP
implementations are everywhere.
> No matter, I can allow truncated tails when reading chunks. But I
> don't think we ought to make that a requirement or make special unit
> tests for that.
Well, the unit tests already exist, which is why I think we shouldn't
stop supporting that. |
|