Message197975
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, barry, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, eric.smith, ethan.furman, georg.brandl, mrabarnett, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, theller, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年09月17日.09:10:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1628504091.69543647.1379409030523.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<1379408228.4.0.392702864137.issue18986@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Georg Brandl added the comment:
>
> Not really. Would "entry" be acceptable instead of "item"?
getentry() sounds decent to me, but it loses the parallel to popitem() and items(). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年09月17日 09:10:38 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, tim.peters, barry, theller, georg.brandl, rhettinger, vstinner, eric.smith, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, Arfrever, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, sbt, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2013年09月17日 09:10:38 | pitrou | link | issue18986 messages |
| 2013年09月17日 09:10:38 | pitrou | create |
|