Message196962
| Author |
tim.peters |
| Recipients |
Tamas.K, csernazs, grahamd, jcea, ncoghlan, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, tim.peters |
| Date |
2013年09月04日.21:57:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1378331862.56.0.105473555243.issue18808@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Oops! The docs are wrong - a negative timeout actually raises:
ValueError: timeout value must be strictly positive
unless the timeout is exactly -1. All the more reason to ensure that a negative waittime isn't passed.
I opened a different issue about the doc glitch. |
|