Message196510
| Author |
scoder |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, eli.bendersky, maker, mmokrejs, r.david.murray, scoder, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2013年08月30日.04:27:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1377836836.96.0.324869432674.issue18850@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> As an advice I hope you do not take as insult, saying
> "in section {section} the spec says {argument}"
> is much more constructive than
> "read the spec on that", "{extremely_obvious_link}",
> at least to people not familiar with the spec and asking for the source > of your arguments (msg196360). Can shorten threads, too.
No harm done. The reason why I just posted the spec URL is that it's actually the entire spec that backs the argument. XML is (essentially) specified as a mapping from a sequence of bytes to a hierarchical structure (and back again). That's why there is an XML declaration header that names the encoding, for example. It wouldn't be needed if XML was defined as Unicode data. |
|