Message196323
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, jcea, leim, macfreek, ncoghlan, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年08月27日.22:14:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADiSq7eKoGAEV2UMP5oQXNVXop9oc3taDhcjcVcQhooesQ55dw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1377637960.33.0.865058107802.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
I'd also be fine with "is_carrier_private", or, as you say, the inverse
"is_global" for "not is_private and not is_carrier_private and not (any of
the other private addresses)" (assuming I understood that suggestion
correctly).
I guess the "is_global" one is the most useful, since that lets you know if
you can send or store that address directly, or if you need to translate it
to a persistent global address somehow. |
|