Message 196064 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	eli.bendersky, flox, jcea, ncoghlan, python-dev, scoder
Date	2013年08月24日.06:26:18
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1377325579.13.0.569670181638.issue17741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Using tulip-inspired method names (when tulip hasn't landed) to duplicate existing data input functionality (feed() and close()) seems a rather dubious design decision to me. Given how popular lxml.etree is as an alternative to the standard library's etree implementation, we shouldn't dismiss Stefan's design concerns lightly.

Content

Using tulip-inspired method names (when tulip hasn't landed) to duplicate existing data input functionality (feed() and close()) seems a rather dubious design decision to me.
Given how popular lxml.etree is as an alternative to the standard library's etree implementation, we shouldn't dismiss Stefan's design concerns lightly.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013年08月24日 06:26:19	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, jcea, scoder, eli.bendersky, flox, python-dev
2013年08月24日 06:26:19	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1377325579.13.0.569670181638.issue17741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013年08月24日 06:26:19	ncoghlan	link	issue17741 messages
2013年08月24日 06:26:18	ncoghlan	create

homepage