Message195934
| Author |
lambertv |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, lambertv, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年08月22日.23:57:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1377215846.58.0.25075626571.issue18623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I have included a patch that moves _SuppressCoreFiles into test.support and a test that checks whether resource.RLIMIT_CORE is being properly set and reset. It would be nice if there was a more explicit way to test the creation of core files, however.
The patch also corrects a comment that stated ulimit was being set to (0, 0) when in the code only the soft limit was being set to 0. I'm pretty sure that the later should be done because then we don't run into trouble when we have to restore the hard limit to its original (higher) limit. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年08月22日 23:57:27 | lambertv | set | recipients:
+ lambertv, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti |
| 2013年08月22日 23:57:26 | lambertv | set | messageid: <1377215846.58.0.25075626571.issue18623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年08月22日 23:57:26 | lambertv | link | issue18623 messages |
| 2013年08月22日 23:57:26 | lambertv | create |
|