Message194963
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, eli.bendersky, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年08月12日.14:00:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1376316018.51.0.588335277736.issue18710@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Previously, the only way to add a dialect was through register_dialect that does
> type checking to make sure it gets a legit dialect object. Now, the _dialects dict is
> directly accessible to Python code and it can add arbitrary objects to it (both as
> keys and as values). Does this mean that the C code now has to do type checking in all
> internal code that accesses _dialects?
You are right, I forgot about that part. That will make the patch significantly more complicated.
> However, it's a step in the right direction in case we do have multiple instances of
> the extension module alive at the same time in the future. Although then it would be
> interesting to consider how to find the actually correct module instance from internal
> functions.
This sounds basically impossible (which is why we *can't* have multiple instances of an extension module alive in a single interpreter :-)). |
|