Message194684
| Author |
eli.bendersky |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Robin.Schreiber, asvetlov, effbot, eli.bendersky, pitrou |
| Date |
2013年08月08日.15:16:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAF-Rda_5KaBqTjGp40ipYaDSRU=OeerCiY67mkZrVz7z6_XcEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<296734553.50663270.1375971265469.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| Content |
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> > Would you mind removing it from the patch, due to the case described
> > above?
> > ISTM that in real scenarios the sys.modules cache kicks in anyway. It
> > should not be really bypassed for any given sub-interpreter in sane
> > code.
>
> Yeah, I think you're right. I'll submit an updated patch or, if it's
> the only issue with it, perhaps you can simply remove the 3 offending
> lines?
>
Sure, I'll do that. Thanks. |
|