Message194612
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Robin.Schreiber, asvetlov, effbot, eli.bendersky, pitrou |
| Date |
2013年08月07日.14:00:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1399729306.48655520.1375884001005.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAF-Rda9PFepvu4VY1Ux_xZnbyhzevoMAoqoGfv-LSU_jQphq2g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
> That's true, but I thought one of the goals of PEP 3121 is to
> separate
> states between sub-interpreters. So that one can't corrupt another.
> I'm not
> sure how much it matters in practice in this case of the pyexpat
> capsule;
> need to look into it more.
pyexpat's "capi" object is a static struct inside pyexpat.c, so that
wouldn't change anything.
Separating states between sub-interpreters only matters when said state
is mutable, which it isn't here.
> I don't see a call to PyState_AddModule. What am I missing?
It is called implicitly when an extension module is imported. |
|