Message193588
| Author |
rbcollins |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pitrou, r.david.murray, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, zach.ware |
| Date |
2013年07月23日.08:26:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1374567991.95.0.431598002992.issue18526@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'll do a full review shortly, but at the conceptual level, I don't see any benefit in making a new SkipTest base class, other than instantly breaking other runners when an unknown exception is raised. SkipTest is part of the API. Making a new exception part of the API requires a strong reason - not just 'we want to show it differently' but 'we want the runner to behave differently. |
|