homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients JayKrish, Todd.Rovito, philwebster, terry.reedy
Date 2013年07月16日.05:40:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1373953245.23.0.990794064621.issue18425@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As I said on one of the other issues, which I hope you read, we have the option of gui tests when mocking becomes too complicated. So at least for now, put the test that requires marks in a separate test case with requires('gui') in setUPClass.
The problem with a full implementation of marks is that they change position when text is inserted or deleted before their position. Also, some mark functions are easier if they are stored in a dict, while one function and the movement operations are easier if they are stored in a sorted list. A partial implementation that allowed only 1 or 2 marks would be easier that a full implementation allowing any number. Mock marks that do not move (and don't need to because of no inserts or deletes between definition and use) would also be easy. So I want to see how marks need to be used for testing before doing anything.
Even when a mock is used, we can temporarily use the tk version to verify that the mock is working right. I did that in the patch for #18279. See the commented out code in
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/22ce68d98345.
History
Date User Action Args
2013年07月16日 05:40:45terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, Todd.Rovito, JayKrish, philwebster
2013年07月16日 05:40:45terry.reedysetmessageid: <1373953245.23.0.990794064621.issue18425@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013年07月16日 05:40:45terry.reedylinkissue18425 messages
2013年07月16日 05:40:44terry.reedycreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /