Message193072
| Author |
paul.j3 |
| Recipients |
bethard, eric.araujo, htnieman, manveru, paul.j3, tshepang, vajrasky, xuanji, ysj.ray |
| Date |
2013年07月15日.03:58:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1373860719.14.0.681699472704.issue11874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I just filed a patch with http://bugs.python.org/issue10984 (argparse add_mutually_exclusive_group should accept existing arguments to register conflicts) that includes the latest patch from this issue. I tweaked it so _format_actions_usage only returns arg_parts. The block of _re. statements (# clean up separators for mutually exclusive groups) are in a nested function so it can be applied to each of the parts.
In that issue I wrote a custom formatter that handles groups even if they share actions, or the action order does not match definition order. For that it is easier to work with the arg_parts as generated here rather than the whole usage line. |
|