Message191621
| Author |
shwouchk |
| Recipients |
sbt, shwouchk |
| Date |
2013年06月21日.23:04:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1371855866.06.0.839294319728.issue18277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Richard,
I think you missed my point. First, yes I did do that.
Second ("the point"):
I did this to use the same abstraction that was used extensively for other purposes, instead of recreating the same abstraction with a deque as its basis. Component reusability is one of the main points of OOP, after all...
And no, an item is not necessarily available - sometimes there is a message and sometimes there isn't. But if one was put into the queue, I claim that I should be able to rely on it being available right away in the application logic. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年06月21日 23:04:26 | shwouchk | set | recipients:
+ shwouchk, sbt |
| 2013年06月21日 23:04:26 | shwouchk | set | messageid: <1371855866.06.0.839294319728.issue18277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年06月21日 23:04:26 | shwouchk | link | issue18277 messages |
| 2013年06月21日 23:04:25 | shwouchk | create |
|