Message191506
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
brian.curtin, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, neologix, pitrou, tim.golden, trent, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年06月20日.08:45:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwb-kbXFFyWSDmzbpGx5ukDPKxzKbHtKcZxQzGb_57SUFA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1371716696.84.0.87003276337.issue13483@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
>> I plan to test the Low Fragmentation Allocator, at least on Windows 7.
> I don't think it can be any better than raw mmap() / VirtualAlloc()...
I mean using the Low Fragmentation Allocator for PyObject_Malloc()
instead of pymalloc.
Martin wrote (msg148605):
"As an alternative approach, Python could consider completely dropping
obmalloc on Windows, and using a Windows Low Fragementation Heap (LFH)
instead, with HEAP_NO_SERIALIZE (as the heap would be protected by the
GIL)." |
|