Message191029
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, gregory.p.smith, jlaurila, jszakmeister, kristjan.jonsson, ncoghlan, neilo, pitrou, pjmcnerney, rhettinger, tlesher, vstinner |
| Date |
2013年06月12日.14:48:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1371048498.67.0.625451613952.issue3329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Benchmark of py_setallocators-3.patch:
- benchmarks suite (-b 2n3): some tests are 1.04x faster, some tests are 1.04 slower, significant is between 115 and -191. I don't understand these output, but I guess that the overhead cannot be seen with such test.
- pybench: "+0.1%" (diff between -4.9% and +5.6%)
If I understood correctly, the overhead is really really low (near zero). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年06月12日 14:48:18 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, barry, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, jszakmeister, tlesher, jlaurila, neilo, pjmcnerney |
| 2013年06月12日 14:48:18 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1371048498.67.0.625451613952.issue3329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013年06月12日 14:48:18 | vstinner | link | issue3329 messages |
| 2013年06月12日 14:48:18 | vstinner | create |
|