Message190841
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
akuchling, belopolsky, cvrebert, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, python-dev, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2013年06月09日.04:06:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADiSq7ciV2Mubx0TtD1ZnaZJHC0A1eQ+mjG5xFQx=hmkVtqRmA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1370730801.53.0.909538014442.issue4153@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
amk's latest patch looks like a very nice improvement to me.
One suggested wording tweak for the aside about the simplified
history: s/The average Python programmer doesn't need to know the
historical details/The precise historical details aren't relevant to
understanding how to use Unicode effectively/ (and then continue with
"; if you're curious ..." as it does now) |
|