Message189814
| Author |
oscarbenjamin |
| Recipients |
Jeffrey.Armstrong, Martin.Fiers, Pete.Forman, RubyTuesdayDONO, Seppo.Yli-Olli, alexis, cmcqueen1975, danmbox, doko, eric.araujo, geertj, jonforums, jwilk, loewis, oscarbenjamin, paul.moore, pje, rpetrov, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, schmir, tarek |
| Date |
2013年05月22日.13:23:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAHVvXxRLcMKDnVa++XJCsjLJsCexcQ9PJq6HnohKpgccH4Dqzw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAHVvXxQR_10reJCOE3tP86P+a2HR3ZCLqRDGx-duut8fzzvPsA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
On 22 May 2013 13:40, Oscar Benjamin <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> However on further reflection I'm a little reluctant to force an error
> if I can't *prove* that the setup is broken.
After a little more reflection I realise that we could just do:
if self.gcc_version < '4' or is_cygwingcc():
# use -mno-cygwin
This way the cygwin/gcc-4 error is still emitted only if gcc emits it.
If the is_cygwingcc() function is conservative then there could be
cases where it mistakenly does not use -mno-cygwin but that would have
to be a broken cygwin/gcc-4 setup anyway. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2013年05月22日 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | set | recipients:
+ oscarbenjamin, loewis, doko, paul.moore, pje, geertj, schmir, tarek, jwilk, eric.araujo, rpetrov, cmcqueen1975, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, alexis, Seppo.Yli-Olli, jonforums, RubyTuesdayDONO, Jeffrey.Armstrong, danmbox, Martin.Fiers, Pete.Forman |
| 2013年05月22日 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | link | issue12641 messages |
| 2013年05月22日 13:23:08 | oscarbenjamin | create |
|