Message189094
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
barry, ethan.furman, ncoghlan |
| Date |
2013年05月13日.04:09:04 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CADiSq7cXX5RvnXpKC0JrD+etpGj_mncnuCJM7ZKts2vVACte6g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<51904A8A.3080604@stoneleaf.us> |
| Content |
Accepting awkward implementation details when their rationale no longer
applies doesn't make sense to me, no.
The functional API originally used integers for good reasons. Over the
course of the enum discussions, those reasons evaporated, but this wasn't
noticed until after the PEP was accepted.
However, the acceptance of the PEP is why I have proposed this as a
post-incorporation change. |
|