Message189087
| Author |
barry |
| Recipients |
barry, ethan.furman, ncoghlan |
| Date |
2013年05月13日.01:57:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<54F3BF79-A1F0-4BA8-84E2-A49BD306922E@python.org> |
| In-reply-to |
<1368405353.16.0.149348878037.issue17961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On May 12, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Ethan Furman added the comment:
>
> The class syntax (and default Enum) no longer have preferential treatment for integers (even __int__ is gone); so it is completely up to us as what should happen for the functional syntax.
Do you really think the enum discussion on python-dev was too short and could use another few thousand messages? ;)
Or IOW, hasn't this already been decided by virtue of PEP acceptance? |
|